Innovation Failure: Ignorance or Arrogance?
06:04In
my Twitter stream yesterday I found this nice article by Michael Schrage
entitled Embrace your ignorance. His slightly provocative title is
meant to signal that perhaps you live in a self-satisfied bubble of assumed
intelligence and knowledge about your customer, when in fact you should be happy
to be humble about your ignorance, and act accordingly.
Schrage
goes on to extol the values of experimentation and "big data" as methods to
discover what customers really want, but here he loses me a bit. I'd rather go
back to an even simpler way of discovering needs, by asking and observing in
real time where the real opportunities and pains exist, or where actual
solutions fall short or have gaps. Ethnography, getting close to the customer
and their use of a solution or their experience, is what indicates where the
opportunities and problems lie. From those observations we can extrapolate and
create potential solutions, which can become the basis for experiments, which
will prove or perhaps disprove our hypothesis. I worry that all the emphasis on
"big data" will signal shifts that seem important but aren't, or miss factors
that can't be captured in quantitative data. As Einstein noted, not everything
that counts can be counted.
Embracing
your Ignorance
Good
innovators are humble people. I don't mean that they are people who grovel, or
let others walk all over them. Certainly Steve Jobs will never be known as a
"humble" person in that sense. What I mean is that they have the scars of
experience, of making the wrong assumptions or even having the audacity to
suggest they know what customers needed, and failing. Humility comes when we
recognize that customers decide the value and importance of our products and
services. No matter how valuable or important we think they are, customers
determine the value. The faster we understand this and learn to listen and
observe, the more likely we are to create innovations that matter.
In
our work we've identified a number of attributes that good
innovators possess. One of those we highlight is "beginner's mind" - that is,
the ability to examine a problem or opportunity as if for the first time. Too
many times we approach a problem with the full suite of knowledge and
experience, never recognizing that all the knowledge and experience narrows the
potential scope of outcomes. Knowledge and experience about candles doesn't
open the door to electric light, it merely makes more effective candles. To
think differently and creatively about a problem or opportunity we need to think
about it with a beginner's mindset, something that Jobs to his credit did well.
Rather than rush to apply everything we know, instead approach the problem as if
for the first time. In the absence of knowledge or experience, how might you
solve the challenge or problem?
Losing
your arrogance
Too
often corporate innovators are guilty of unintentional arrogance. They are
guilty of assuming that they know what customers want, or worse, of simply
creating new technology or new solutions with features that they either think
customers want, or features that are simply better than what the competition
offers. This arrogance is often built on past successes that span years, so the
arrogance can be earned, and in some cases even justified. But increasingly the
further a person is from a customer and their needs, and the longer it's been
since you walked in that customer's shoes, the more likely you
are arrogating - the word arrogance derives from -
making undue claims in an overbearing manner. Pride goeth before a fall, but I
suspect arrogance goes shortly thereafter.
Ignorance
or Apathy?
There's
an old joke about education, where the individual in question responds with I
don't know and I don't care (Ignorance and/or Apathy). In the case of a modern
day innovator, armed with social media, surveying tools, focus groups, big data,
experiments and a host of other methods to gather insight, ignorance simply
isn't plausible. There is simply too much data, too much information to plead
ignorance about an opportunity. That suggests apathy, which I'll also reject.
Most innovators I've come in contact with are passionate people, who want to do
a good job and deliver value to customers. What's left after ignorance and
apathy? Well, there are two remaining reasons why innovation discovery fails:
time constraints and arrogance.
The
first barrier is a time or resource constraint. Far too many people recognize
the need for more customer interaction, more data analysis, more discovery and
experimentation, but they simply cannot find the time. Highly efficient
processes leave little time and room for experimentation or new discoveries.
Thus many innovations are launched on a hope and prayer that the innovator
guessed correctly, since they didn't have time to gather needs. On the other
hand is arrogance. Too many innovators and their companies believe they know
what customers need and deliver new technologies or features without ever
discovering needs. They might have the time but don't have the inclination.
This approach happens far more frequently in high tech or software industries,
where adding new features is simpler, but it happens in all industries.
Arrogance is a real problem for innovators who assert that they know what
customers want, or assert that new products and features are so compelling that
they will override customer concerns.
Get
rid of your arrogance, get rid of your ignorance
If
you are willing to lose a bit of your arrogance, you can easily get rid of your
ignorance. Becoming a bit more humble, interacting with customers,
understanding their needs and journeys, will open the door to new discoveries.
With these discoveries you become more knowledgeable about their needs and
possible innovation opportunities, which you can test and validate through
experiments. Losing your arrogance helps you lose your ignorance. Sustaining
your arrogance sustains your ignorance and wastes valuable time and
resources.
0 nhận xét